<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>West Loop Financial LLCRevisiting Anomalies’ Persistence &#8211; West Loop Financial LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/01/19/revisiting-anomalies-persistence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.westloopfinancial.com</link>
	<description>Evolutionize Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.22</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Revisiting Anomalies’ Persistence</title>
		<link>https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/01/19/revisiting-anomalies-persistence/</link>
		<comments>https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/01/19/revisiting-anomalies-persistence/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[westloop]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ETF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An article I wrote in September discussed the findings of the study, “Benchmarks as Limits to Arbitrage: Understanding the Low-Volatility Anomaly,” in which the authors proposed a new explanation for why anomalies (such as the low-beta/low-volatility anomaly) persist. They hypothesized that the typical institutional investor’s mandate to maximize the ratio of excess returns relative to...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/01/19/revisiting-anomalies-persistence/">Revisiting Anomalies’ Persistence</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.westloopfinancial.com">West Loop Financial LLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article I wrote in September discussed the findings of the study, “Benchmarks as Limits to Arbitrage: Understanding the Low-Volatility Anomaly,” in which the authors proposed a new explanation for why anomalies (such as the low-beta/low-volatility anomaly) persist.</p>
<p>They hypothesized that the typical institutional investor’s mandate to maximize the ratio of excess returns relative to a fixed benchmark without resorting to leverage can affect the relationship between risk and expected return.</p>
<p>Many institutional investors who are in a position to offset an irrational demand for risky assets also have fixed benchmark mandates that are typically capitalization-weighted. Thus, straying from the benchmarks to exploit anomalies creates career risk.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.etf.com/sections/index-investor-corner/swedroe-revisiting-anomalies%E2%80%99-persistence" target="_blank">ETF.com</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/01/19/revisiting-anomalies-persistence/">Revisiting Anomalies’ Persistence</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.westloopfinancial.com">West Loop Financial LLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/01/19/revisiting-anomalies-persistence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
