<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>West Loop Financial LLCWall Street&#8217;s Lame Excuses for Active Fund Performance &#8211; West Loop Financial LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/03/09/wall-streets-lame-excuses-active-fund-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.westloopfinancial.com</link>
	<description>Evolutionize Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.22</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Wall Street&#8217;s Lame Excuses for Active Fund Performance</title>
		<link>https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/03/09/wall-streets-lame-excuses-active-fund-performance/</link>
		<comments>https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/03/09/wall-streets-lame-excuses-active-fund-performance/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 09:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[westloop]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[US News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The securities industry is working itself into a frenzy trying to explain why you should ignore historical data that indicates most actively managed funds underperform their benchmarks. Some of the reasons they provide do not withstand scrutiny. Here&#8217;s a small sample of their lame excuses: 1. Last year was an aberration. According to Dan Culloton,...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/03/09/wall-streets-lame-excuses-active-fund-performance/">Wall Street&#8217;s Lame Excuses for Active Fund Performance</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.westloopfinancial.com">West Loop Financial LLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The securities industry is working itself into a frenzy trying to explain why you should ignore historical data that indicates most actively managed funds underperform their benchmarks. Some of the reasons they provide do not withstand scrutiny. Here&#8217;s a small sample of their lame excuses:</p>
<p><strong>1. Last year was an aberration.</strong> According to Dan Culloton, Morningstar’s associate director of manager research, as interviewed by Kathleen Pender in a December 2014 SFGate article, most domestic funds own more small and mid-cap equities than the Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500 index. Large-cap stocks outperformed small-cap stocks in 2014. Because the S&amp;P 500 index contains mainly large-cap U.S. stocks, actively managed funds couldn&#8217;t “keep up.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? According to the mid-year 2014 SPIVA U.S. Scorecard, most domestic stock funds underperformed their benchmarks over the past five years. There was nothing aberrational about 2014.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article at <a href="http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/the-smarter-mutual-fund-investor/2015/02/18/wall-streets-lame-excuses-for-active-fund-performance" target="_blank">US News</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/03/09/wall-streets-lame-excuses-active-fund-performance/">Wall Street&#8217;s Lame Excuses for Active Fund Performance</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.westloopfinancial.com">West Loop Financial LLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.westloopfinancial.com/2015/03/09/wall-streets-lame-excuses-active-fund-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
